<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for very small thoughts of jan hoyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Graphics and Media for Effecting Change</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on changes in heart by Kelli</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/changes-in-heart/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/changes-in-heart/#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Hi Jan
 
Found you here by following links from 911 Visability Project.  I thought I'd say hi as I've never emailed or had any discussions with you.  I've been doing small research projects and editing work with 9/11 Research for about four months.  Mainly I've been working with Gregg Roberts, but sometimes with Jim.  I just wanted to say hi!! =o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jan</p>
<p>Found you here by following links from 911 Visability Project.  I thought I&#8217;d say hi as I&#8217;ve never emailed or had any discussions with you.  I&#8217;ve been doing small research projects and editing work with 9/11 Research for about four months.  Mainly I&#8217;ve been working with Gregg Roberts, but sometimes with Jim.  I just wanted to say hi!! =o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on changes in heart by grzzap</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/changes-in-heart/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>grzzap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/changes-in-heart/#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>nice Site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice Site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on concrete reflection by verysmallthoughts</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/65/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>verysmallthoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/65/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Yes. Born in California, raised in the Des Moines area. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Born in California, raised in the Des Moines area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on concrete reflection by sherri</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/65/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>sherri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/65/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>are you from des moines? where do you practice qi gong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you from des moines? where do you practice qi gong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by verysmallthoughts</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/about/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>verysmallthoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-661</guid>
		<description>The Vanity Fair article is a prime example of careful manipulation of a target market.
According to Conde Nast's media kit for Vanity Fair, ONLY 22% of Vanity Fair readers are men, with over 90% of their readers having an annual income of over $75,000 yr.
http://www.condenastmediakit.com/vf/circulation.cfm
As a female with a bit of experience in the marketing field, it is my conclusion that the Vanity Fair article is alienating to the majority of their audience demographics. My visual analysis .pdf is available here:
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pages/reviews.htm
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vanity Fair article is a prime example of careful manipulation of a target market.<br />
According to Conde Nast&#8217;s media kit for Vanity Fair, ONLY 22% of Vanity Fair readers are men, with over 90% of their readers having an annual income of over $75,000 yr.<br />
<a href="http://www.condenastmediakit.com/vf/circulation.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.condenastmediakit.com/vf/circulation.cfm</a><br />
As a female with a bit of experience in the marketing field, it is my conclusion that the Vanity Fair article is alienating to the majority of their audience demographics. My visual analysis .pdf is available here:<br />
<a href="http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pages/reviews.htm" rel="nofollow">http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pages/reviews.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on methods by [URL=http://food-calorie-count-chart.ttramadol.info]food calorie count chart[/URL]</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/08/26/22/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>[URL=http://food-calorie-count-chart.ttramadol.info]food calorie count chart[/URL]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/08/26/22/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your site. I have found here much useful information...  &lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your site. I have found here much useful information&#8230;  <a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on gadsden flag image by verysmallthoughts</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/misc-and-gadsden-flag/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>verysmallthoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/misc-and-gadsden-flag/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Good question. Cool name for a town, maybe with a historical tie in.

Without looking into the history, since the Gadsden spelling is exactly the same this would sure seem it be the case,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. Cool name for a town, maybe with a historical tie in.</p>
<p>Without looking into the history, since the Gadsden spelling is exactly the same this would sure seem it be the case,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on gadsden flag image by Gadsden Alabama</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/misc-and-gadsden-flag/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadsden Alabama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/misc-and-gadsden-flag/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Is the city of Gadsden Alabama named after this or not? I've heard both ways....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the city of Gadsden Alabama named after this or not? I&#8217;ve heard both ways&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the te of piglet, biking bounce by munis</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/tao-of-pooh-bike-riding-getting-back-up/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>munis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/tao-of-pooh-bike-riding-getting-back-up/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>very nice of you ! that you provided me the links.Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice of you ! that you provided me the links.Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Patrick Milan</title>
		<link>http://janhoyer.wordpress.com/about/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I think your analysis of the Vanity Fair article is not quite fair (sic).
Certainly, there is an element of distancing herself, but I find
that quite defensible.  It's clear this event and its consequences
have disturbing implications for the state of the US power system 
and for the future of the US.  In the circumstances, some degree of
camouflage in presenting a contrary opinion is not only prudent,
it is quite conventional - as in any system where the ability to speak
freely is circumscribed (whether admittedly or not, is beside the 
point).  Surely you would want people to do their own thinking,
analysing and even investigating.  By pointing its readers in the 
direction of the Loose Change video, the article encourages just that.

I see more manipulative material every day in the British press,
on quite trivial (by comparison) subjects.

PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your analysis of the Vanity Fair article is not quite fair (sic).<br />
Certainly, there is an element of distancing herself, but I find<br />
that quite defensible.  It&#8217;s clear this event and its consequences<br />
have disturbing implications for the state of the US power system<br />
and for the future of the US.  In the circumstances, some degree of<br />
camouflage in presenting a contrary opinion is not only prudent,<br />
it is quite conventional - as in any system where the ability to speak<br />
freely is circumscribed (whether admittedly or not, is beside the<br />
point).  Surely you would want people to do their own thinking,<br />
analysing and even investigating.  By pointing its readers in the<br />
direction of the Loose Change video, the article encourages just that.</p>
<p>I see more manipulative material every day in the British press,<br />
on quite trivial (by comparison) subjects.</p>
<p>PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
